Fyboard
Sign in to Fyboard

The system of record for how work actually happens.

AlphaCore — Fyboard's contract lifecycle platform

AlphaCore is the records-first surface for contract operations. Authoring, e-signature, obligations, compliance, workflows, repository, and search are all built on the same engines — every clause is structured operational state.

Capabilities

  • Contract Authoring Draft, version, redline, and execute contracts as governed records — not Word documents in folders.
  • E-Signature Signing as operational activation, not a terminal event.
  • Smart Obligations Contracts as live operational entities, not reminders.
  • Compliance & Risk Continuous compliance, audit-grade evidence, and principle-driven controls.
  • Workflows Contracts don't execute themselves. AlphaCore workflows do — with audit-grade state.
  • Universal Repository The contract system of record — a system that remembers, governs, and explains.
  • Search & Discovery Semantic search across contracts — keywords, structure, and explanations together.

See pricing or compare AlphaCore at /alphacore/compare.

7 capabilities total.

Fyboard / AlphaCore
governed · attributed · versioned

Where contracts live,
not just where they're
stored.

AlphaCore turns every contract into a governed, living record — with obligations anchored to source paragraphs, state changes attributed to people, and a complete audit history that runs to the moment of signature and beyond.

For organizations who treat contracts as operational records, not stored documents.
Source-anchored obligationsTime-machine versioningPer-record accessNative to Fyboard
RC
TM
IF
In production at Indian infrastructure enterprises managing multi-entity contract portfolios at ₹2,500cr+ scale.
System pulse
14mo audit
Records8,412
Obligations · live47
Decisions · today12
Lifecycle statev3.2 · live
Draft
Negotiation
Approved
Signed
Active
Renewal
CONTRACT RECORD · MSA-2024-0847
Master Service Agreement
Acme Corp · Signed 14 Mar 2024
ACTIVE
VAL $2.4M·CL 47·VER 3.2·RISK low
Source-anchored clause · §4.2

“The Service Provider shall maintain valid insurance coverage of not less than $5,000,000 and provide certificates evidencing such coverage annually…”

Auto-extracted obligation
Insurance certificate refresh
Due in 14d·Owned by RK·Recurs annually
SB
Suhel Bansal opened · 2 min ago
Obligations · cross-portfolio
47 active
Quarterly audit report
MSA-2024-0847
SB
Completed
Insurance certificate refresh
MSA-2024-0847
RK
Due in 14d
Data compliance review
MSA-2024-0847
AM
Due in 30d
Performance bond renewal
EPC-2024-0312
VK
Overdue · 3d
§01Why contracts fail

The system that managed the document steps aside at the moment the contract starts mattering.

Three failures compound after signing. Each one is a consequence of treating the contract as a file, not a record.

(01)The problem
Decay observed
184dsince signature
0alerts fired

Contracts break after signing, not before.

Most systems treat signing as the finish line. In reality, signing is when the contract begins to matter.

After execution, obligations activate. Timelines start running. Money moves — $340k of penalty exposure accrues silently. Responsibilities shift. The system that managed the document up to signature steps aside the moment its work would actually count.

Contracts don't fail because they're poorly written. They fail because they stop being managed.

Post-execution decay · MSA-2024-0312
184d elapsed
Mar
Contract signed
May
Insurance lapsed
Jun
Audit deadline
Aug
Renewal notice
Oct
SLA breach
Today
Discovery
4
Obligations missed
$340k
Penalty exposure
0
Alerts fired
(02)The problem
Live state
v3.2current version
2obligations pending

Documents are static. Contracts are not.

A document captures text at a moment in time. A contract lives across years — years, not minutes of state changes, amendments, party rotations, renewals.

The document can tell you what was agreed. It cannot tell you what is active, what is pending, what has changed, or what is at risk right now.

Only by treating the contract as an operational record — not a file — can a system reason about its present state.

The document
/signed/
14 Mar 2024 · frozen
Knows what was agreed.
The record
Live
MSA-2024-0847
v3.2
State
Active
Pending2 obligations
RiskLow · stable
Renews90d
Last 48h
SB opened § 4.2
Audit run · pass
RK · obligation ack
Knows what is true now.
(03)The problem
Source of truth
7surfaces
0owners

Responsibility dissolves after execution.

Before signing, contracts have clear ownership. Legal authors. Counterparties review. Stakeholders approve.

After signing, the same contract appears across 7 surfaces and belongs to none of them. Email threads. Slack messages. Calendar invites. Spreadsheets. ERP entries. Drive folders. Signed PDFs — every reference, no source.

The questions that follow have no answer holder. That gap is where risk lives.

Same contract · 7 surfaces · 0 owners
⚠ no source of truth
Email
Re: contract update
Slack
#legal-ops · 14 Mar
Spreadsheet
tracker_v18_FINAL.xlsx
Calendar
Renewal review
Drive
/Contracts/2024/Q1/
ERP
PO #4471
PDF
MSA_signed_final.pdf
Truth holdernone
Questions with no answer holder
Who approved version 3.2?
Under which clause did this expire?
Why didn't anyone catch the missed renewal?
What changes

These aren't feature gaps. They're the consequence of not governing the contract as a record. AlphaCore is the system that does.

§02AlphaCore doesn't live alone

One record. Four modules. One platform.

AlphaCore doesn't ship with integrations — it ships as a citizen of the platform. The contract record below isn't a single object; it's a row joined across four modules of shared substrate.

Contract record · row in shared db
MSA-2024-0847Master Service Agreement · Acme Corp
v3.2 · ACTIVE
FyDrive
layer · drive_id
File · permissions · path
Open module
Vendors/Acme Corp/2024/MSA-0847.pdf
Inherited from Procurement
FyBrain
layer · extraction_id
Clauses · obligations · risk
Open module

“§4.2 — Service Provider shall maintain insurance of $5,000,000 delivered annually…”

extracted47 clausessurfaced12 obligationsriskLow · stable
People
layer · principal_id
Owners · counterparties
Open module
RK
Rohan Kapoor
Owner · Compliance · Bareilly
AC
Acme Corp Inc.
Counterparty · entity, not string
assigned3 obligations
Automation
layer · automation_id
Triggers · workflows
Open module
on:renewal-90d
Notify owner·Create review task·Escalate at 30d
One row · four lanes · shared substrate
joins: drive_id·extraction_id·principal_id·automation_id
Two architectures, side by side
Standalone CLMintegrate with
API hops per record4–5
Latency per join~150 ms
Auth surfaces5
Audit logs5 silos
Permissionsduplicated
Failure mode
One API down → partial record. The system can't answer.
AlphaCore on Fyboardis part of
API hops per record0
Latency per join<5 ms
Auth surfaces1
Audit logs1 chain
Permissionsinherited
Failure mode
Atomic. The record is whole, or the write is rejected.

That isn't a feature claim. It's an architecture.

§03What AlphaCore actually governs

A contract isn't a document. It's four governed objects that move through time together.

Lifecycle. Parties. Decisions. Obligations. Each is a first-class record. Each has its own state, owner, and audit trail.

What looks like a contract on a screen is, underneath, a small constellation of governed records joined to one another.

A —Specimen — the four governed objects
(01)governed object
Currently
Activesince 14 Mar
47din state

Lifecycle

An explicit set of states the contract moves through.

Not workflow steps. Discrete, governed states with defined transitions, authorized actors, and recorded entry conditions. The contract is always in exactly one.
rec
47d in state · 184d total
01
Draft
02
Negotiation
03
Approved
04
Signed
05
Active
06
Renewal
schemastate {enum, 6} · entered_at · entered_by · transition_id
(02)governed object
Bound
5principals
L2delegation

Parties

Everyone the contract binds, references, or empowers.

Counterparties as organizational entities. Signatories with authority scope. Internal owners with delegated responsibility. Reviewers with bounded approval rights.
rec
1 counterparty · 4 internaldelegation chain L2 → L3
RC
RCL Industries
Counterparty · org
AS
Anita Sharma
Authorized signatory · CFO
RK
Rohan Kapoor
Obligation owner · Compliance
+3
3 reviewers
Decision authority · scoped
schemaprincipal_id · role_scope · authority_basis · binding_class
(03)governed object
Logged
12decisions
100%anchored

Decisions

Every authorized choice that shaped the contract.

Approvals, rejections, deferrals, scope changes — each with its actor, authority basis, conditions, and timestamp. Recorded once. Tamper-evident. Always retrievable.
rec
Approve at price ceiling
decision-04 · 12 Mar 2026 · 14:42 IST
Recorded
AS · CFO · approved · within delegation cap ₹50cr
Policy P-127 · permitted · discount ≤ 8%
Hash · anchored · 0x4af2…b91c
schemadecision_id · actor · authority · conditions · hash · timestamp
(04)governed object
Active
3obligations
14dnext due

Obligations

Every commitment the contract creates, by whom, by when.

Anchored to source clause. Owned by a named person. Tracked through satisfaction. Surfaced as work, not as a list of clauses someone has to remember to read.
rec
next 90dtoday · +30d · +60d · +90d
§4.2Insurance certificate refresh14dDue
§7.1Quarterly performance review47dScheduled
§9.3Annual audit attestationSatisfied
schemaobligation_id · clause_anchor · owner_id · due_at · state
B —A state transition, instrumented

What it actually means to approve a contract.

One contract. One transition. Negotiation → Approved. Below is every record AlphaCore writes when that single state change happens — and what becomes possible, and impossible, the moment it does.

transition record· MSA-2024-0847
committed
fromNegotiationtoApproved
12 Mar 2026 · 14:42:07 IST
Records written4 / 4 anchored
Actor
AS · Anita Sharma · CFO
authority: delegation L2
Authority basis
Policy P-127 · approval cap ₹50cr
verified: cap not exceeded
Conditions met
Risk: Low · Counterparty diligence: passed
evidence: 4 attachments linked
Audit anchor
0x4af2c91d…b91c
block 18,234,991 · tamper-evident
Becomes possible
  • The signature workflow can begin
  • Counterparty receives signing link with exact approved version
  • Obligation drafts attach to the record (provisional, not yet active)
  • Renewal clock primed for activation upon signing
Becomes impossible
  • Further redlines without re-entering Negotiation state
  • Approval by anyone outside the recorded delegation chain
  • Quietly rolling back without leaving a forensic trail
  • Backdating any decision recorded in this transition
Net effect

A state change in AlphaCore is a record you can audit, not an email someone sent.

C —Memory — the contract as a time machine

Ask the contract what was true last March, and the system answers.

Most systems remember what changed. AlphaCore remembers what was true — at every recorded moment, alongside who knew what, who could act, and what the system would have done if asked.

Contract memory· MSA-2024-0847
Approved
At v1.0, on 12 Mar
AS · CFO · within delegation L2
What was true at this momentsnapshot pinned
OwnerLegal — approved by CFO
Obligations12 (frozen, ready to activate)
CounterpartyAcme Corp · verified
Risk scoreLow — clean
tap a node to travel to that moment3 / 4
Why this matters

Once contracts are governed as records with state, authority, and memory, they stop being passive documents. They become operational.

See it across the lifecycle
§04The proving groundlive · 547d running

AlphaCore wasn't built for hypothetical customers. It was built for one we know intimately, and deployed there long before we shipped a public version.

18 months of real contracts. Real states. Real obligations tracked, missed, satisfied. Refined inside an Indian infrastructure enterprise running a portfolio at ₹2,500cr+ scale.

The kind of proof you only get from running the system on contracts where the consequences are real.

A —The ledger — what AlphaCore manages there, today
Under management
1,400+ contracts
Across 11 group entities
Obligations tracked
8,400+ active
Source-anchored to clauses
Counterparties
320+
Verified · deduplicated
Continuous run
18 months
No downtime · no migration

Numbers reflect production state as of Mar 2026. The deploying entity is referenced as “the operator” below — identifiable details are withheld at their request, but the system, the records, and the operational scale are real.

B —One real obligation, caught

An insurance certificate that was missed for 47 days on the previous system. AlphaCore caught the next one with 90 to spare.

Before · spreadsheet-tracked
caught 47 days late
With AlphaCore · obligation-anchored
satisfied 14 days early

One ₹140cr EPC contract. Two annual obligations: insurance certificate refresh, performance-bond renewal. Both buried in §4 and §11 of the master agreement. Both scheduled to recur every year. Both forgotten in spreadsheets the year before AlphaCore went live.

On the AlphaCore-managed cycle, the obligations were extracted at the moment the contract was uploaded — anchored to source, owned by the named compliance officer, and surfaced as work, not as text. The system fired at 90, escalated at 30, and satisfied at 14.

EPC-2024-▓▓▓▓ · obligation §4.2 · audit anchor 0x7c3a…d191
Exhibit · production record
EPC-2024-▓▓▓▓· ▓▓▓▓ Infrastructure Pvt Ltd · v3
Active
Source · §4.2

“The Contractor shall maintain valid insurance coverage of not less than ₹14,00,00,000 and provide certificates evidencing such coverage annually…”

What AlphaCore did
ExtractedDay 0
On contract upload · anchored to §4.2
Fired−90d
Owner notified · review task created
Escalated−30d
Routed to compliance lead · no ack
Satisfied−14d
Certificate uploaded · obligation closed
identifiable details redacted at the operator's requesttamper-evident
C —A note from the founder
On building it where it lives

Every line of AlphaCore was written knowing that the next contract it would touch would be one I knew about personally — and would answer for if it broke.

Deployment anchor
first writeop04 Sep 2024
uptime547d · 99.97%
audit chainunbroken
Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh · running on real contracts

We didn't build AlphaCore to sell to companies like ours. We built it because we needed it ourselves, and could no longer pretend that running a multi-entity operation on spreadsheets and email threads was acceptable. The public version exists because what we built worked, and we think the same problem exists in your operation.

Vikas
Founder · Fyboard·letter logged 12 Mar 2026
anchor 0x4af2…b91c
What this means for you

Most CLM products promise what their roadmap says. AlphaCore promises what production says. Every feature you've seen on this page is currently managing real contracts at real scale — not in a sandbox, not in a demo instance.

§05Role lenses

One record. Five lenses. The same truth, surfaced for the work each role actually does.

Legal sees the redlines and the authority chain. Finance sees the payment schedule and the caps. Operations sees obligations as a queue. Risk sees the breach surface. Executive sees the portfolio position. Same record. Same database. Different projection.

Permissions follow the lens — not the other way around.

drawing01/05
Plan · Legal lens· MSA-2024-0847 · v3.2 · scale 1:1
Active record

The clause, the redline trail, the authority chain — and the obligations Legal owns.

Clause focus · §4.2v3.2 · 2 redlines accepted

“The Service Provider shall maintain valid insurance coverage of not less than $5,000,000 and provide certificates evidencing such coverage annually…”

Redline trail
v3.0 → v3.1· RCL counsel · raised cap to $5M
v3.1 → v3.2· Acme counsel · added annual cadence
Authority basis
Anita Sharma · CFO
delegation L2 · cap ₹50cr · cap not exceeded
Your obligations · 2 owned
§4.2Insurance certificate refresh14dDue
§7.1Counsel review cycle47dScheduled
same record · different projection
rev 12 · 12 Mar 2026·live
What lenses are not

A lens is not a separate copy of the contract. It's the same record, projected. When Risk acknowledges a regulatory trigger, Legal sees that decision in their authority chain. When Finance marks a milestone paid, Operations watches the obligation close. The lenses look in. The truth is one.

How permissions actually work
§06
How we compare
— a brief intermission.

For the careful reader who's still here

Most CLM pages end with a feature matrix. We'd rather end with an argument — and one honest admission.

The argument
01 of 02

Other CLMs are tools you bolt onto your stack. AlphaCore is part of your stack. That difference cascades through every claim on this page — from how obligations get extracted, to how permissions inherit, to how a state change becomes a record you can audit, not an email someone sent.

In plain language
02 of 02
(01)
Them

They are standalone products.

Us

AlphaCore is a platform module — sharing one database, one identity model, one audit log with the rest of Fyboard.

(02)
Them

They sell features. We earn trust by shipping architecture.

Us

Repository, obligations, audit, access, versioning — these aren’t features we built. They’re consequences of the underlying record model.

(03)
Them

They will ship anything to win the demo.

Us

We won’t. We’d rather ship the layer underneath right than ship the layer on top fast. Some features take longer because of this.

On the road map
What's not here yet

Authoring isn't shipped yet — negotiation-grade drafting and clause assembly. It's on the road map. We'd rather ship this part right than ship it all early. Until then, you bring the document and AlphaCore governs everything that happens to it after.

Shipping cadence · architecture-first
Want the line-by-line?

The full architecture breakdown lives at Intelligence Center.

25 protocols analyzed across CLM, CRM, document workflow, and more — written for the people who actually have to choose between platforms and want to see the architectural reasoning up close.

14 live analyses11 in pipeline56% coverage
See the comparison
§07How adoption actually works

One contract. Seven days. From upload to first obligation firing — what the path actually looks like.

We'll walk through it minute by minute, on a real contract, with real timestamps. The point isn't to show off the product — it's to remove the ambiguity about what changes on the day you go live, and the days after.

Day 0·14:32 IST(01)

You upload the contract.

One drag, one drop. The record is created before you let go.

Just dropped
MSA-Acme-v3.pdf
4.2 MB·47 pages·uploaded by NK

You drag the contract in. AlphaCore creates a record, hashes the source, and assigns it a permanent ID before anyone sees it. From this moment, every change is recorded against this ID.

Detected
Document typeMaster service agreement
CounterpartyAcme Corp · matched
CurrencyUSD · $5M cap detected
Governing lawCalifornia · §22.4
Record IDMSA-2024-0847
Day 0·14:34 IST · +2m(02)

FyBrain reads it.

Clauses, obligations, and risk surface in seconds — each anchored to its source paragraph.

FyBrain · extraction workerelapsed: 38.2s
14:34:01[info]FyBrain · extraction worker initiated
14:34:08[info]Document segmented · 47 pages → 312 paragraphs
14:34:21[ok]§ 4.2 · obligation candidate · confidence 0.94
14:34:24[ok]§ 7.1 · obligation candidate · confidence 0.91
14:34:27[ok]§ 9.3 · obligation candidate · confidence 0.96
14:34:32[warn]§ 11.4 · ambiguous · flagged for review
14:34:38[info]Extracted 4 obligations · 2 decisions · 1 risk flag
Extracted
§4.2
Insurance certificate refresh
conf 0.94
§7.1
Quarterly performance review
conf 0.91
§9.3
Annual audit attestation
conf 0.96
§11.4
Ambiguous · review
conf 0.62
Day 1·09:15 IST(03)

You review what was extracted.

Human in the loop. Nothing goes live without your sign-off.

§4.2
conf 0.94
Insurance certificate refresh

"…shall maintain valid insurance coverage of not less than $5,000,000 and provide certificates evidencing such coverage annually…"

Accepted
§7.1
conf 0.91
Quarterly performance review

"…the Service Provider shall submit performance metrics within 15 days of each quarter end…"

Accepted
§11.4
conf 0.62
Ambiguous obligation flagged

"…the Parties shall consult in good faith on material changes…"

Needs review

— You see what was extracted, what FyBrain's confidence was, and the source paragraph it came from. You accept, edit, or reject each one. Nothing goes live without your sign-off.

Day 1·11:40 IST(04)

You assign owners.

From your existing team directory — not a separate AlphaCore user list.

Your teamshared directory
RK
Rohan Kapoor
Compliance lead
Owner
AS
Anita Sharma
CFO
Owner
NK
Nikhil K.
Legal counsel
PJ
Priya J.
Procurement
Owner
Obligations · assigned
§4.2Insurance refresh
RK
§7.1Quarterly review
PJ
§9.3Audit attestation
AS
AS · CFO has L2 delegation · cap ₹50cr
Day 2·00:00 IST(05)

The system goes live.

Alerts armed. Audit chain anchored. Renewal flagged.

System activation · MSA-2024-0847
02 Jan · 00:00:01 IST
Now armed
3 obligations · monitored · alert thresholds set
1 escalation chain · NK → RK → AS · 30d/14d/7d
Audit anchor written · 0x4af2…b91c
Permission scope · contract owners + finance + legal
Renewal flag · 90 days before 24 Mar 2027
From this moment, every state change is a tamper-evident record.Live
Day 7·09:00 IST(06)

The first obligation fires.

In someone's queue, with the source clause and the deadline.

New work · in your queue08 Jan · 09:00 IST
§4.2·MSA-2024-0847 · Acme Corp

Insurance certificate refresh — due in 90 days

Certificate of insurance covering the next 12-month period. Source clause requires $5M minimum. Last cycle landed 14 days before deadline — comfortable buffer.

Owner:
RK
Rohan Kapoor

Seven days after upload, the system fires the first obligation. Not an email someone wrote. Not a calendar reminder someone set. A piece of governed work, surfaced where work happens.

⤳ After day seven
If you're migrating

Bulk import keeps history.

Existing contracts come in with versions, decisions, and obligations preserved. Previous-system audit trails get attached as evidence rather than replaced.

If you're rolling out a team

Permissions inherit from your team directory.

Roles, delegations, and reporting lines come from the team directory you already maintain — already configured, already kept current. No separate AlphaCore user list to provision.

If you're integrating

It's already integrated.

FyDrive holds the source files. The team directory drives ownership. FyTask receives the work. FyCal flags the renewals. No external connectors to set up.

⤳ Next

Seven days from upload to live obligation. Add a few more for the second contract, fewer for the tenth. The path is short because the system already knows your people, your folders, and your work.

§08Security

Built for the infosec questionnaire, not the sales call.

doc · alphacore-sec-v1.4 · request the full packet under NDA
Residency
AI EXTRACTION
FyBrain · Indian region
Clauses · obligations · risk · embeddings
no third parties
PRIMARY DEPLOYMENT
Mumbai · ap-south-1
Application · encrypted storage · object store
in country
EXTERNAL TRANSIT
Encrypted · TLS 1.3 · pinned certs
API egress · audit shipping
encrypted only
No cross-border data transfer · Indian residency intact

The biggest difference

Your contracts don't leave the country. Neither does the AI that reads them.

FyBrain handles extraction, embeddings, and analysis inside the Indian region — no third-party LLM providers, no cross-border calls. The platform itself sits in Mumbai. External services see only encrypted transit. DPDP-aligned by construction.

Region
ap-south-1
AI residency
Indian region
Data egress
TLS 1.3 only
Sub-processors
Disclosed
(01) · EncryptionLive

AES-256 at rest. TLS 1.3 in transit.

Database, backups, and inter-service traffic — all encrypted with rotating keys.

AES-256-GCMTLS 1.3mTLS90d rotation
(02) · Access controlLive
T0
T1
T2
T3

Permissions enforced at the data layer, not the app.

A 4-tier monotonic grant model enforced at the database layer. Fail-closed by default — the application can't override what the data layer denies.

4 tierspolicy-enforcedrow-levelfail-closed
(03) · Audit chainLive
0x9e1c
0x4af2
0xc3e1

Every state change is a tamper-evident record.

Hash-anchored, append-only, separately verifiable. The audit log is itself an artefact.

SHA-256append-onlyper-recordverifiable
Attestations
Live
DPDP Act · IN
2023 Act aligned
Live
GDPR · EU
DPA + SCCs ready
In progress
SOC 2 Type II
controls in build
In progress
ISO 27001
gap assessment
On request
Pen test
summary on NDA
Shared responsibility · the boundary
We own
Platform availability
Backups · 30d PITR
Key management
Monitoring · patching
Audit chain integrity
You own
User access · MFA · SSO
Tier mapping · roles
Document classification
Incident reporting
Data retention policy

The full security packet — DPA, sub-processors, diagrams, pen-test summary — available under NDA.

§09Pricing

Contract infrastructure. No surprises.

Per-owner pricing. Editors manage contracts. Viewers — auditors, stakeholders, exec dashboards — read for free, always.

Per-owner pricingUnlimited viewers, freeYour data, always exportable
save ~20%

Free

· always free

1 contract · 5 AI jobs/mo · 1 GB Drive · 3 editors + unlimited viewers

Start Free

Solo

Professional contract management

$159/mo

save $480/year

Contracts
2 active
AI Jobs
30/month
  • 2 active contracts
  • 5 GB Drive + e-signatures
  • 30 AI processing jobs/month
  • Full Gmail integration
Start Solo

Growth

Full contract operations

$399/mo

save $1,200/year

Contracts
3 active
AI Jobs
100/month
  • 3 active contracts
  • 25 GB Drive + full insights
  • 100 AI jobs + portfolio calendar
  • Read-only API access
Start Growth
Recommended

Scale

Scaling contract portfolios

$1,199/mo

save $3,600/year

Contracts
10 active
AI Jobs
500/month
  • 10 active contracts
  • 100 GB Drive + RBAC
  • 500 AI jobs + batch processing
  • Full API access
Start Scale

Business

Enterprise-grade CLM

$3,599/mo

save $10,800/year

Contracts
50 active
AI Jobs
2,000/month
  • 50 active contracts
  • 500 GB Drive + webhooks
  • 2,000 AI jobs (priority queue)
  • 3-year audit + dedicated onboarding
Start Business

Enterprise

Mission-critical infrastructure

Custom

$8,000 – $50,000/mo

Contracts
Unlimited
AI Jobs
Unlimited
  • Unlimited everything
  • SSO / SAML / SCIM
  • Multi-org & on-premise options
  • Dedicated account manager
Contact Sales
⤳ Going deeper

Add-ons, competitor pricing analysis, and the line-by-line tier comparison — including how AlphaCore stacks up against Ironclad and Icertis on per-seat math — live on the full pricing page.

§10FAQ

The questions we hear from buyers, with the answers we'd give over coffee.

No collapsible accordions, no hidden objections. If you're asking it, someone before you has asked it — and we'd rather you read the honest answer here than wait for the demo call.

Cluster A

Adoption & migration

How you actually get on, and how you bring what you already have.

(01)

How is this different from just using Notion + Google Drive + a shared calendar?

We don't replace those — we sit on top of them with structure. Notion is great for documents, Drive for files, calendars for time. None of them know what an obligation is, who owns it, what clause it came from, or whether it was satisfied. AlphaCore is the layer that turns those tools into a contract operation.

(02)
In pipeline

How does migration from Ironclad, Icertis, or SAP CLM work?

Direct import from incumbent CLMs isn't shipped yet — we're building structured importers for these specifically because every export format is different and bad migrations are how trust gets lost. In the meantime, we'll do supervised migrations as part of enterprise onboarding — your team exports, we map the schema, contracts come in with their version history and audit trail attached as evidence. Talk to us; we'll be straight about what works today and what we'll build for your shape of data.

(03)

What's the realistic implementation timeline for a real org — not the 7-day demo?

It depends on portfolio size, document quality, and how clean your existing folder structure is. The 7-day demo in §07 is real, just for one contract — your full portfolio takes longer because each contract needs review, owner assignment, and permission scoping. We'll scope this honestly during your pilot — sample your contracts, walk through the path, give you a calibrated estimate before you commit.

Cluster B

Operations & limits

The practical questions about day-to-day use, integrations, and what isn't here yet.

(04)

E-signature — do you integrate with DocuSign, or do you have your own?

We have our own. FySign ships as part of FyTools — included free with every tier, no separate module. Sign requests fire from the contract record, signatures land back on the same record, and the audit chain anchors the signature event automatically. Bulk sign-out flows, custom routing, and conditional signer chains live in the Automation module. We didn't see a reason to ask you to pay DocuSign for something that's already part of your platform.

(05)

Authoring isn't shipped yet. What do we use for drafting in the meantime?

Whatever you use today — Word, Google Docs, your law firm's templates. AlphaCore picks up the contract once it's drafted. When Authoring ships in Phase 2, redlining and clause assembly become native; until then, you bring the document and we govern everything that happens to it after.

(06)

How does AlphaCore handle external counterparties — clients, vendors? Do they need accounts?

No. External parties never log into AlphaCore. Document requests, signature flows, and counter-redline cycles all happen via secure links — no account creation required. Internally, their organisation appears as a counterparty record with full history; externally, they see only what you share.

(07)

Will my Legal team complain that AlphaCore isn't a Word add-in?

Maybe at first. Lawyers live in Word, and we don't fight that — drafting still happens wherever your team drafts today, and AlphaCore takes over once the contract is ready to run. What changes their minds isn't our pitch; it's the first month of obligations being tracked automatically and decisions being recorded with hash anchors. The work AlphaCore does for them was previously theirs to do manually.

Cluster C

Trust & continuity

Lock-in, ownership, and the question every honest buyer eventually asks.

(08)

What happens if we want to leave? Are we locked in?

Your data is yours. Full export at any time — contracts as PDFs, metadata as JSON, obligations as CSV, audit chain as signed JSONL. No proprietary format you can't read elsewhere. No export fee, no notice period. The lock-in we want is workflow value, not data captivity.

(09)

What if we outgrow our tier mid-contract?

You move up, prorated. No re-negotiation, no penalty. Going the other direction (consolidating after a corporate change, for instance) we'll work the math fairly — published prices are floors, not ceilings, and it cuts both ways.

The hard question

Why should we trust a solo founder with our entire contract operation?

The honest version — what we tell every infosec lead, every CFO, every general counsel who asks.

Three things, said plainly. One, AlphaCore is already running our own ₹2,500cr+ portfolio — we eat what we cook, and the consequences of failure are ours first. Two, your data is exportable from day one — if the worst happens, you walk away with everything intact, in standard formats, no questions asked. Three, source escrow is on the table for enterprise contracts. We'd rather make continuity contractual than ask you to trust on faith.

VK
Vikas
Founder · Fyboard
Still have questions?

The fastest way is to ask us directly.

30-minute call with the founder. No deck, no pitch — your questions, our straightest answers, walking through the product on your contracts if you want.

§11 — The decision

— you've read enough.

AlphaCore is a different kind of CLM because it's not a CLM at all — it's a contract-shaped layer of an operating system you were going to have anyway.

We built it for a real ₹2,500cr+ portfolio, and ran it there before we ever shipped it publicly. The features we haven't shipped, we haven't shipped — and we've told you which ones, on this page, before you asked. The decision is whether you want a tool you bolt on, or a layer you stand on.

What happens next
(01)

30-min call

No deck. We walk through your contracts together.

(02)

Try it

Free tier or short paid pilot — your call. Real contracts, real obligations.

(03)

Decide

Continue, or take your data and walk away. No friction.

Book a 30-minute call
Not ready yet?Read the security packet first— same thing happens after.

Built by people who answer for the contracts they govern.

VK
Vikas · Founder · Fyboard